Codes & Ordinances

9 2010 Revised Monroe City Nuisance Ordinance

Written by Emalee Curtis. Posted in Codes & Ordinances.

MONROE CITY CORPORATION

ORDINANCE 9-01-2010

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 1-02-2000 AN ORDINANCE FOR ABATEMENT OF WEEDS, GARBAGE, REFUSE AND UNSIGHTLY OBJECTS OR STRUCTURES AND ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A PROCEDURE FOR MANAGEMENT, CONTROL AND SUPERVISION OF NUISANCES WITHIN MONROE CITY

PURPOSE- To encourage property owners in Monroe City to maintain their properties so that they are free from weeds, garbage, refuse, unsightly objects and structures. In keeping with the powers granted to municipalities by Chapter 11, Title 10, Utah Code Annotated, 2010, Monroe City establishes through this ordinance a means for removing, abating or causing the removal or abatement of the previously mentioned conditions.

DEFINITION- Any weeds, garbage, refuse, or unsightly objects or structures that create fire hazards, sources of contamination or pollution, dangers to health and safety, breeding places or habitations for insects or rodents, or any other conditions that threaten the health, safety and well-being of Monroe City residents are considered nuisances and violate this ordinance.

PROPERTY MAINTENANCE AND NOISE

It is declared in this ordinance that the following list, or any other conditions which threaten the health, safety and well being of Monroe City residents, are considered nuisances and violate this ordinance.

1. Rank or noxious weeds of any state of maturity.

2. Buildings or structures, which have been abandoned, partially destroyed, improperly maintained or partially constructed.

3. Dead, decayed, or diseased vegetation

4. Abandoned, inoperative or other dilapidated or unsightly motor vehicles, trailers, campers, boats, RVs or other mobile equipment stored so as to be visible from the public streets or stored upon public streets.

5. Attractive nuisances dangerous to children.

6. Discarded or stored furniture, cartons or other unsightly items visible from public streets.

7. Neglecting maintenance of premises causing a condition that is detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare or in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance.

8. Property, building exteriors or equipment, unsightly or in such condition of deterioration or disrepair that the same causes diminution of property values of neighboring property.

9. Any distinctly excessive and loudly audible noise that unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety or welfare of any person, or precludes their enjoyment of property, or affects their property’s value.

The above identified violations and the degree of severity thereof shall be evaluated and determined in light of the types of adjacent properties and the general standards of upkeep of such adjacent properties.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COUNCIL-

The mayor shall appoint with the approval of the council one or more inspectors as needed whose duty it shall be to report to the council as a result of citizen complaint or routine inspection any alleged violation of this ordinance which may be considered a nuisance as previously defined.

The council shall review the alleged violations as a committee of the whole and determine what action, if any, will be taken as provided for in this ordinance.

If upon review the council determines that the reported condition is in violation of this ordinance, the council may direct the inspector or city staff to follow one of the enforcement procedures explained in the Enforcement section of this ordinance.

ENFORCEMENT- The ordinance shall be enforced through one or both of the following actions, as determined by the council.

INFORMAL NOTICE- The inspector or his designee shall contact the property owner and/or occupant of the premises where the violation is occurring and encourage cooperation in removing the objectionable condition. A suggested time limit of not less than ten days but not more than twenty days shall be included in the request for corrective action.

FORMAL NOTICE- The inspector or his designee shall serve notice to the property owner and/or occupant of the premises where the violation is occurring in writing by registered letter that a violation is occurring. The property owner and/or occupant of the premises shall be given at least ten days and not more than twenty days as determined by the inspector to take corrective action. The formal notice shall:

Describe the specific premises on which the violation exists, explain the specific nature of the violation and state the corrective action that is needed.

1. Inform the property owner and/or occupant that if there are any objections to the notice or its provisions, a hearing with the city council may be requested in writing at a time and place to be set by the council. At the time the property owner and/or occupant applies for a hearing he shall be informed as to the time limit for conforming to the original notice.

2. Inform the property owner and/or occupant that failure to correct the objectionable condition will result in the city correcting the problem and costs incurred will be collected from the property owner and/or occupant either by requesting payment or by charging the costs against the property as a tax.

HEARINGS-

In the event that the property owner and/or occupant of the premises where the violation is occurring requests a hearing, the mayor or his designee shall set the time and place for a hearing and the property owner and/or occupant shall be notified in writing. The hearing shall not be held less than five days of notification that the registered letter has been received.

The council shall conduct an informal hearing. The property owner and/or occupant may discuss objections to the formal notice and present such information as is pertinent to determining if the objectionable condition does indeed constitute a nuisance. The inspector and other interested persons may also present pertinent information.

If the council decides that the property owner and/or occupant is in violation of this ordinance, the original notice shall stand and the property owner and/or occupant shall have ten days from notification that the registered letter has been received to correct the condition. Additional time may be allowed by the mayor or his designee, or litigation may be commenced to secure payment of the costs of removal, together with interest, court costs and reasonable attorney fees.

If the council overrules or modifies the original notice, the council’s written decision shall explain what corrective action, if any, is needed. The property owner and/or occupant shall have ten days from the notification that the registered letter has been received to correct the condition. Additional time may be allowed by the mayor or his designee.

FAILURE TO COMPLY-

If any property owner and/or occupant to whom formal notice was previously served shall fail to take the required corrective action, the council shall employ the necessary assistance to correct the nuisance at the city’s expense.

An itemized statement of the charges for the corrective action taken including a service charge of not less than $100, depending on the costs of the work performed, shall be mailed to the property owner and/or occupant. Payment will be required within twenty days from the notification that the registered letter has been received.

If the expenses are not paid, the statement may be reported to the County Treasurer for inclusion in the property’s tax notice in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section10-11-4, Utah Code Annotated, 1953.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COMPLIANCE- When a property owner and/or occupant complies with the notice of violation by completing the required corrective action, that property owner and/or occupant shall be notified in writing that the property is no longer in violation of this ordinance.

Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately after final passage.

 

Adopted by the Monroe City Council this _14__day of __September__, 2010.

{Corporate Seal}

______________________________________

Mayor R. Kirt Nilsson

ATTEST:

_________________________________

City Recorder Emalee H. Curtis

 

Affidavit of posting

Emalee H. Curtis, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that she is the duly appointed and qualified Recorder of the City of Monroe, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Utah, and that on the_24th __day of August, 2010 she posted a true and correct copy of Ordinance 9-01-2010 - repealing Ordinance 1-02-2000 and adopting an ordinance providing for a procedure for management, control and supervision of nuisances with Monroe City, said posting being made at the Monroe City Office, Monroe City Library and Crisp Grocery.

Dated this 11th day of August, 2010

_________§_________________

Emalee H. Curtis, City Recorder

 

A summary of this ordinance was published in the Richfield Reaper September 22, 2010 

 

 

Who is Online

We have 116 guests and no members online